GHOST IN THE MACHINE?

SOME OBJECTIONS TO RYLE FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF BEHAVIORISTS

Authors

  • Mauricio Ortega Gonzalez Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, México
  • Felipe de Jesús Patrón Espinosa Autonomous University of Baja California

Keywords:

category mistake, cartesian dualism, conceptual analysis, behaviorism, mind-body union

Abstract

Gilbert Ryle elaborated a critique of the Cartesian conception of mind from the field of philosophy in his work The concept of mind. The analyses and arguments presented in this study are still recurrent among psychologists, particularly those with a behavioral orientation, with the purpose of showing the mistakes that characterize Cartesian dualism that today continues with great acceptance in psychological theories. However, psychologists are mostly unaware, due to little or no philosophical training, that followers of Cartesian dualism have developed novel arguments that questioning various points of Ryle’s philosophy, thus providing an apparent coherent and solid system that is attractive to those psychologists who adhere to the mind and body union and interaction approach. The purpose of this paper is to expose some of the arguments of the opponents of Rylean philosophy in the facing the possible implications in psychology.

Published

2022-10-04

How to Cite

Ortega Gonzalez, M., & Patrón Espinosa, F. de J. (2022). GHOST IN THE MACHINE? SOME OBJECTIONS TO RYLE FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF BEHAVIORISTS. LÍMITE Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy & Psychology, 17. Retrieved from https://revistalimite.uta.cl/index.php/limite/article/view/322

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.